INTERPRETIVE THEORY: CLIFFORD GEERTZ
INTERPRETIVE
THEORY
In
anthropological literature Clifford Geertz was the leading figure in
interpretive anthropology, he considered the concept of culture essentially,
SEMOITIC one i.e. symbolic. Interpretive anthropology is referred as symbolic anthropology
as well. It has two lines running parallel to each other headed by two
different leaders inheriting ideas from different ideals. Symbolic anthropology
is led by both Clifford Geertz and Victor Turner. Geertz was influenced by Max Weber and Turner was influenced by Durkheim.
The
interpretive social science can be related to the work of Giovanni Batista Vico (1668-1744), Dilthey (1833-1911) and most of all of Weber (1864-1920). Interpretive school grew out of convergence of
disciplines such as philosophy, phenomenology, hermeneutics, ethnomethodology
and sociology.
Weber’s
idea was that, man is an animal suspended in the webs of significance which was
adopted by Geertz therefore only he was the one taking culture as webs and he
propounded use of interpretive analysis instead of experimental science for
examining such webs of significance.
How
does Turner’s symbolic approach differ from Geertz’s interpretive approach? Although
they belongs to symbolic school of anthropology, their understanding of symbols
is different.
GEERTZ
Influenced
by Max Weber
Unlike
object in natural world humans are not simply product of pulls and pushes
Individual
create their own world
Actor
centric
IDEA OF SYMBOL
System
of inherited conceptions by means of which men communicate, perpetuate and
develop attitude and knowledge towards life. Symbols are Vehicles of Culture.
TURNER’S SYMBOLIC APPROACH
Influenced
by Emile Durkheim and Max Gluckman
Social
solidarity : Symbolic logic that connect people
Collective
consciousness
IDEA OF SYMBOL
Instigate
social action
Operators
in social process
By
their arrangement produce social transformation which tie people to the norms
of the society
Helps
in resolving the conflict and aid in changing status of the actors/people
CLIFFORD GEERTZ
Man
is in need of symbolic sources of illumination to orient himself with respect
to the system of meaning that is any particular culture.
Images
of the spider that spins its web and is suspended in that web.
Analysis
of culture should be interpretive in search of meaning.
Culture
is expressed by the external symbols
Culture
as a historically transmitted pattern of meanings embodied in symbols.
Symbols
are vehicles of cultures
Culture
as a social phenomena and a shared system of intersubjective symbols and meanings.
THICK DESCRIPTION (Reading culture
in a new way) Introduced by G. Ryle further developed by Clifford Geertz
A
way of writing that includes not only describing and observation but also the
context in which that behavior occurs.
The
close analysis of or the close reading of
a particular production or event
so as to uncover meanings.
It
also helps to discover, within the overall cultural system, the network of
conventions, codes and modes of thinking with which a particular item is
implicated.
It
is unearthing the underlying meaningful structure of local events and local
interactions.
Thick
description goes beyond surface appearances to include the context, detail,
emotion and webs of social relationships.
Thick
description specifies many details, conceptual structures and meanings.
The
example most commonly used to explain thick description comes from Ryle. He
argued that if someone Wink at us without a context we don’t know what it
means. We can report on the Wink (thin description).
But
if we provide a context we will know if the person is attracted to us or that
she/he is trying to communicate secretly or that she/he has something in
his/her eye. As the context changes the meaning of Wink changes.
Thick Description : Explains
the context of practices and discourses in a society.
Thick
description: Observation
Description
Interpretation of a situation
Analysis
In
Anthropology, Sociology, Religious studies, Human and Organizational studies
thick description not only explains human behavior but its context as well.
THIN
DESCRIPTION: is factual account without any description
Biographical
(who)
Historical
(what led to this)
Situational
(context)
Relational
(what’s happening)
Interactional
(what are the meaning and relationship)
Deep Play notes on the Balinese
Cock Fight (1972)
Employing the method of thick
description
Deep Play Notes on the Balinese cock fight is one of the Clifford Geertz most
influential articles which illustrates not only the meaning of a given cultural
phenomena (Balinese cock fight)
Geertz
interpretive approach see culture as a set of texts to be read by the
anthropologists
Geertz
shows how the Balinese cock fight serves as a cultural text which embodies at
least a portion of what the real meaning of being a Balinese.
Despite
being illegal cockfight is a wide spread and highly popular phenomena in Bali
at least at the time Deep Play : Notes on the Balinese cockfight was written.
Geertz
reports that the Balinese people deeply detest animals and more specifically
expression of animal like behavior.
However
they have a deep identification with their cocks.
Balinese
man not only identify his ideal self with the cock but even his penis
(masculinity) also.
At
the same time what he fears, hates and ambivalence being what it is; fascinated
by the powers of darkness.
Although
gambling is a major and central part of the Balinese cockfight.
Geertz
argues that the most fundamental behind is not just money but prestige and status
He distinguishes deep fights with high wages and shallow fights with low wages of both gambling and prestige
The
result of cockfight is unpredictable.
The
odds are more even and bets are more balanced.
Financial
gain is not the centre of the event but rather everything which expressed in
the concept of status.
Cockfight
is a fight for status.
Bets
only symbolizes the risk; but it is a momentary gain or loss.
According
to Geertz –Cockfight is not between individuals but is rather a simulation of
the social structure of kinship and social groups.
People
never bet against a cock from their own reference group. Fighting always takes
place between people and cocks from opposing social groups, family, clan,
village etc. and is therefore the most overt manifestation of social rivalry
and a way of addressing rivalries.
The
Balinese cockfight as Geertz puts it a way of playing with fire without getting
burned.
Social
tensions are represented through the cockfight but after all it just a
cockfight.
Geertz
also notes that the higher status of the participants in the cockfight, the
deeper the cockfight is.
SUMMARY
Women
and young and socially disadvantaged people are not allowed to attend
cockfight.
The
main players are the most respected and politically involved members of the
community.
The
actual cockfight is a human competition delegated to animals where the winner
gets respect and admiration from others, money is the secondary thing.
Cock
symbolizes masculinity and the rules of cockfight in every village are passed
down through generations along with other legal traditions.
According
to Geertz cockfight is a cultural phenomena. For local population cockfighting
is also an instrument of self-analysis and a way of presenting their culture to
outsiders.
Comments