INDIGENIZATION OF INDIAN SOCIOLOGY
INDIGENIZATION
OF INDIAN SOCIOLOGY
Indigenization is the
act of making something more native, transformation of some service, idea etc
to suit a local culture, especially through the use of more indigenous people
in different spheres.
The essence of
sociology and its uniqueness as a social science lies not in its subject matter
but in its theoretical and methodological orientation. In the west the
theoretical and methodological orientations of sociology have undergone dialectical
changes both through accretion and revision. These changes can be viewed and
interpreted as sustained response to challenges thrown up by the changing
socio-economic and political conditions there. These changes in Western sociology
have encouraged the proliferation of several paradigms.
In India sociology, as
it is known and practiced today, has not been an indigenous discipline. It came
into the country to serve the missionary and administrative interest of the
colonial rulers. As such its establishment and growth in country has had a
strong Western imprint. Given the intellectual neo-colonial attitudes and
cultural imperialism of the West this imprint has continued even after
independence.
Scholars like Louis Dumont and Pocock raised the
debate on ‘SOCIOLOGY FOR INDIA’ in
the first series of Contribution to Indian Sociology. The debate has continued
since in the new series. An integral part of these debates has been the issue
of indigenization of concepts and methods of sociology in India.
On one side of the
debate started with the suggestion of Dumont and Pocock that “in principal a
sociology of India lies at the point of confluence of Sociology and indology”.
The proponents of an indological approach in sociology emphasize that the
contextual specificity of Indian social realities could be grasped better form
the scriptural writings.
T.K.
Oommen pleads that if sociology is to be relevant for
India as a discipline it should endorse and its practitioners should
internalize the value package contained in Indian constitution that is
Socialism, Secularism and Democracy rather than hierarchy, holism, pluralism
and so forth pointed out by the indologists.
Other side of the
debate is identified with a paradigm of Indian sociology free from academic
colonization that is borrowed packages of concepts and methods from other
cultures particularly from the West.
They had opinion that
Western methods and concepts do not have relevance for the Indian social,
historical and cultural situations.
Thus on the
intellectual front the key crisis in Sociology in India is related to
indigenization.
The Native scholars has
begun raising questions regarding the applicability and appropriateness of
theories and methodologies imported from abroad and has started almost a
campaign for their replacement by native categories of thought and indigenous
techniques and methods of research.
Yogesh
Atal
said that the call for indigenization of social sciences was given in the
post-colonial era. He regards this call as an invitation to re-examine the
structure of social sciences and to evolve suitable strategies to promote
indigenization. Here culture became the key issue as different societies have
different cultures.
The demand for what Atal feels, de-parochialization of Western social sciences is the key emphasis
of the demand of indigenization. Indigenization here implies critical
re-examination of Western social science methods and theories in the context of
developing societies. Because these theories and methods have evolved through a
particular content their unquestioned applicability in the new context could be
misleading. According to Atal systematic survey and critical review of the
social science literature generated in developing countries may provide some
help in this regard.
According to Yogesh Atal some of the positive
aspects of indigenization being emphasized by its exponents are:
1
Indigenization is a plea for self awareness
and rejection of a borrowed consciousness. It emphasized the need for an inside
view. Its proponents wish to promote thoughtful analysis of their own societies
to replace the existing trend of knowing these via the West.
2
Draws attention to historical and
cultural specificities and argues for the redefinition, focus with a view of
developing dynamic perspectives on national issues.
3
Advocates the desirability for
alternative perspectives on human societies with a view to making the social
sciences less parochial and enriching them.
4
Indigenization should not lead to narrow
parochialism or to the fragmentation of a single discipline into several
insulated systems of thought based on geographical boundaries.
5
Opposed false universalism as well as
false nationalism.
Attempts
for Indigenization
According
to Atal indigenization has been pursued along with four fronts:
v Teaching
in the national language and use of local materials for study and research
v Research
by insiders
v Determination
of research priorities
v Theoretical
and methodological orientation
It
is evident that a great deal of awareness exists among the Indian sociologists
about the growth of sociology as a discipline. They have taken up self
introspection by analyzing the origin of the discipline and the level of its
growth. The influences of the Western sociology (both American and British) and
Marxian have been taken up with a view to understand the constraints and
challenges shown by the discipline.
Sociology
in India particularly in the 19th century and first half of the 20th
century was not simply an imitation of Western theories, concepts and methods of
research. It was contemporaneous sociology in India.
Comments